Google+

Climate is Moving and So Is The Wildlife

Fuzzy, bright-eyed and no bigger than a baked potato, the American pika is the kind of critter you could imagine starring in a blockbuster animated movie for kids. With its high-pitched squeaks, its lightning quickness and its habit of racing around all summer to harvest and sun-dry “hay piles” of grasses and wildflowers for its winter meals, the tiny rabbit relative is one comical ball of fluff. But what’s happening to the pika is anything but amusing: Climate change has it in the hot seat.

Thick fur, heat-conserving roundish bodies and the use of snowpack as insulation help pikas survive in chilly alpine regions of the western United States and southwestern Canada. Their tolerance range is absurdly narrow, though. They can overheat to the point of death if exposed to too much summer heat. Extreme cold in the winter is just as deadly if they can’t take refuge under the snow.

As alpine temperatures warm and snowpacks shrink, pikas in some places have hightailed it upslope to find more tolerable conditions. But in the arid, mountainous region known as the Great Basin, pikas have disappeared altogether from 40 percent of the locales where they were found in the first half of the 20th century. Apparently already at the upper limits of their ranges, they’ve run out of places to run to.

The pika’s plight may be extreme, but the story line is not unusual. Worldwide — on land, in the sea and in rivers, streams and lakes — wildlife is responding to rising temperatures. The changes are sometimes to the animals’ benefit, sometimes to their peril, say scientists who have pored over reams of recent studies and data from centuries of naturalists’ observations.

Some animals are packing up and moving, generally heading toward the poles or up mountain slopes in search of more hospitable climes. Others are undergoing changes in physiology, behavior or body size — or they’re shifting the timing of seasonal events such as breeding, migration and emergence from hibernation to coincide with earlier springs and later autumns. Just last year, researchers reported seasonal shifts in animals ranging from snow geese in the Arctic to amphibians in a South Carolina wetland to penguins in Antarctica.

And though similar responses have been turning up in many sorts of animals, in many sorts of habitats, researchers are now finding that not all organisms are responding at the same rate or in the same direction. Long-standing associations between predators and prey, parasites and hosts, herbivores and food plants, flowers and pollinators are getting out of sync.

Communities are breaking up and reassembling with new mixtures of members, and it’s hard to predict the effects of such mash-ups, a team of environmental scientists concluded in a paper last year.

access

MAMMAL MAKEUPA shifting climate has brought changes to small-mammal communities in the northern parts of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula. Communities there have become dominated by species typically more common in southern climes, such as the white-footed mouse.Source: P. Myers et al/Global Change Biology 2009

This shifting and reshuffling of the world’s wildlife presents conservation challenges, to which scientists are now turning their attention. What good are nature preserves if changing climate forces safeguarded species to flee into unprotected areas? Or if protected populations perish because, already at the very top of a mountain or at one or the other of Earth’s poles, they can go no farther? Or because, as one author wryly put it, “Los Angeles will be in the way” — meaning that suitable habitats into which animals might relocate have been turned into subdivisions and shopping malls, and escape routes to more distant habitat patches have been blocked.

Prospecting for patterns

Coming up with a cohesive picture of how biological systems are reacting to climate change is a tricky task. Two research groups took up the challenge about a decade ago and published their initial, landmark studies — both still widely cited — in 2003 in the same issue of Nature.

“At that time there wasn’t much out that was pulling things together at all,” recalls Stanford University biologist Terry Root, who headed one of those groups. “I had organized a workshop in 1995 for looking at impacts on species of climate change, and three talks in that workshop had the same plot — different continents and different species, but all showing that species were doing things earlier. I thought, we need to sit back and figure out if this is really going on worldwide.”

Root and coauthors synthesized information from 143 previously published studies and uncovered a consistent finger­print — a temperature-related shift in range, seasonal events, behavior or other traits — in species “from molluscs to mammals and from grasses to trees.” Of the species that showed changes, more than 80 percent were shifting in the directions you’d expect if the shifts were due to climate change.

In the other paper, biologist Camille Parmesan of the University of Texas at Austin and economist Gary Yohe of Wesleyan University in Middletown, Conn., performed various analyses on data from independent studies on more than 1,700 animal, plant and lichen species. Parmesan and Yohe also found biological trends that matched climate change predictions. Butterflies, birds and other organisms had shifted their ranges northward by an average of 6.1 kilometers per decade (or 6.1 meters per decade upward to higher altitudes). Amphibians and migratory birds, among others, were breeding earlier in the spring by an average of two days per decade (SN: 3/8/03, p. 152).

Since then, researchers around the world have been piling up more and more examples of particular animals or suites of species showing changes that fit the same patterns (as well as some that don’t). On the range-shifting side of the story, more than half of 305 common North American birds are wintering farther north than they did in 1966, a National Audubon Society analysis showed in 2009 (SN Online: 2/10/09). The shifts, which average 56 kilometers and are as great as nearly 700 kilometers for individual species, coincide with warmer winter temperatures over the same period.

access

OUT OF SYNCCaribou birthing dates have re­mained steady because the schedule is timed to day length. But the plants that caribou feed on respond to temperature, so they have been emerging earlier as temperatures in West Greenland have increased. Such mismatches could be a common effect of climate change.Source: E. Post and M.C. Forchhammer/Phil. Trans R. Soc. B 2008

In Michigan, opossums, white-footed mice and other mammals once confined to the southern part of the state have rapidly expanded northward, displacing some of their counterparts in the process. A 2009 paper ruled out forest regeneration and land-use changes as possible explanations for the expansion; the authors concluded that warming, documented in the area over the same period, was the probable cause. Meanwhile, chipmunks and other small mammals in California’s Yosemite National Park have moved to higher ground as temperatures in the park have increased in the last century, a 2008 study showed.

Such shifts can shake up communities, and the new assemblages that result may not get along as well as the old gang did. So concluded researchers who used climate and species-distribution models to project future bird communities in California. The upshot of their paper, published in 2009 in PLoS ONE: By 2070, more than half the state could be occupied by entirely new groupings of feathered fauna, with the potential for “dramatic community reshuffling and altered patterns of species interactions.”

Even when interacting species move together, they may not link up in the same way in the new location. When warming nudged Britain’s brown argus butterflies northward, their larvae were far less plagued by parasitoids in the new territory than they had been in the old home, researchers reported in Ecological Entomologyin 2008. The parasitoids were in the new place, too, but apparently more interested in a different butterfly species.

As for changes in seasonal activity, frogs are calling, birds are nesting, salmon are migrating, walleye are spawning, loggerhead turtles are laying eggs and bees and butterflies are appearing earlier in the spring. Plants too are responding by leafing out and flowering earlier.

Underscoring the individual reports, a 2010 study found that seasonal events in the United Kingdom have advanced for most of the 726 terrestrial, freshwater and marine plants and animals examined and that the rate of change has sped up in recent decades. What’s more, change was speediest in organisms at the bottom of the food chain — plants and plant-eaters — and slower in predators, a situation that could result in empty bellies for the planet’s top diners.

Mismatches can happen, too, when interacting species respond to different cues — say, one to day length and the other to temperature. That’s what’s happening with caribou in West Greenland, which synchronize their seasonal migration to calving grounds with day length. The food plants on which they depend respond to temperature, however, and as spring temperatures in the area have risen by more than 4 degrees Celsius, plants have started growing earlier. Caribou are now arriving after peak foraging time, fewer calves are being born and more calves are dying, a 2008 study found.

How the shake-ups will all shake out is hard to tell, concluded authors of a review published last year in the International Journal of Biometeorology. In their roundup of climate-driven mismatches between interacting species, environmental scientist Alison Donnelly of Trinity College Dublin and colleagues found examples of both winners and losers, as well as some partnerships that stayed in sync and some previously mismatched pairs brought into synchrony by rising temperatures. It’s a complicated picture, and to get a handle on how individual species and whole ecosystems will respond to future climate change, scientists will need to delve deeply into relationships among species, the authors contend.

access

SPEED GAMEView larger image | A recent study analyzed how quickly climate change would move across the world during the 21st century, depicted above as the velocity one would have to move along Earth’s surface to maintain a constant local temperature. Different ecosystems show varying average velocities (examples at bottom). Source: S. Loarie et al/Nature 2009map: S.R. Loarie et al/Nature 2009; images, from left: © Jean-Paul Ferrero/Auscape/Minden Pictures/Corbis; Pi-Lens/Shutterstock; Jacques Jangoux/Photo Researchers, Inc.

Root agrees: “What we need to be doing now is actually figuring out how the shifts are affecting biotic interactions so that we know what’s going to happen as far as extinctions go.”

Big picture projects

Teasing apart those interactions, while continuing to document overarching trends, will require heaps of data from long-term monitoring projects that span disciplines, environments, species and food chain levels, Donnelly and coauthors say. One such effort is the USA National Phenology Network. This consortium of researchers, citizen scientists and organizations collects and shares information on plant and animal phenology (the knowledge of when recurring life stages happen and how they relate to climate and change of season).

Changes in phenology are among the most sensitive indicators of global change and, fortuitously, some of the easiest to track. For centuries, people have been paying attention to the seasonal patterns of plants and animals, partly for enjoyment but also to know when to hunt and fish or be on the lookout for particular crop pests. Capitalizing on that interest, the Tucson-based network recruits volunteers to record phenological observations on 166 species of animals and 258 species of plants in an online Nature’s Notebook.

“The beauty is that we have scientists and citizen volunteers all using the same protocols to collect the information,” says Jake Weltzin, the network’s executive director. This process creates a seamless dataset on a wide variety of organisms across the nation that researchers, conservation groups and others can use to piece together the big picture.

In addition to monitoring what’s going on right now, the organization is tracking down and organizing records of what has happened in the past. “About 10 percent of the people in any audience I’m talking to have some kind of phenology records they’ve been keeping on anything from when maple syrup comes to when they applied insecticide on their grapes,” Weltzin says. “We want to create a clearinghouse for these kinds of historical datasets.”

Establishing cause

access

KEEPING PACEAbout 9 percent of Western Hemisphere mammal species may not be able to move to new habitats fast enough to keep up with the pace at which climate change is altering local conditions (velocity of climate change is a measure of the pace required to maintain similar climatic conditions). Mammal species that, on average, won’t move fast enough fall below the diagonal black line in the graph above.Source: C.A. Schloss et al/PNAS 2012

From the earliest studies through the current efforts, a major challenge has been verifying that observed changes in animal distribution, seasonal activities and so on are actually linked to climate change, and then disentangling the relative contributions of natural temperature fluctuations and human-caused temperature increases.

In their 2003 papers, both the Root group and Parmesan and Yohe relied on inference. The logic went like this: Their analyses revealed trends — across many species, ecosystems and geographic regions — that were in the direction you’d expect if climate change were driving the responses. Knowing that global warming had been clearly documented over the same period and that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had concluded that the warming was linked to the rise in greenhouse gases, the researchers felt justified in claiming that, as Parmesan later wrote in a review paper, “twentieth-century anthropogenic global warming has already affected Earth’s biota.”

Critics weren’t convinced. Some argued that data showing temperature increases were collected in hotter urban areas, not where the animals exhibiting trends actually lived.

“I was getting fed up with the naysayers,” Root says, “so in 2005 I looked at species change in relation to actual temperatures recorded at the particular study sites.” The study that she and her coauthors published that year in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences showed a strong link between local temperatures and the timing of biological events. The researchers then looked to see how the observed biological changes fit various climate scenarios generated from three different versions of global climate models: one based only on natural climate variability, one based only on human-caused climate change and one that factored in both natural and human-caused changes. The best fit was with the combined model; the worst was with natural climate variation alone.

“That was just a way of showing that yes, indeed, humans are a part of this,” says Root, who endorses efforts to further clarify the relative contributions of natural and anthropogenic climate change, while conceding that it makes no difference to plants and animals what’s causing the warming. “From a species perspective, it does not matter why the climate is changing, just that it is. From a human perspective, it does matter a lot, because knowing the reason can help us to stop our behavior that is driving the rapid changes.”

Parmesan, however, thinks the pursuit amounts to unproductive hair-splitting. In a commentary published last year in Nature Climate Change, she and coauthors argued that the whole picture is too complex to ever say with certainty that a particular response in a given animal species is due to human-induced climate change. For one thing, animals respond to local climate, but human-caused climate change can be detected only on a larger spatial scale. What’s more, other factors can interact with climate change, enhancing or masking its effects.

“Changes at the local level are going to be a complete mix of interactions among regional climate, habitat loss and local pollution sources,” Parmesan says. Assessing and seeking to understand these interactions is a better use of time and resources than figuring out the specific role of greenhouse gases in driving biological change. Other researchers in the field also are calling for an integrated approach to future research that takes into account interacting environmental pressures, interconnected species and the varied sensitivities of different species to changing conditions. And because temperature isn’t the only driver — some animals are showing behavioral and physiological changes in response to changing carbon dioxide levels or altered precipitation patterns — there are plenty more interactions to factor in.

Another factor to consider is how quickly climate change is moving across the land, says Scott Loarie, a postdoctoral researcher who works with global ecologist Chris Field at Stanford. In 2009, Loarie, Field and colleagues found that, overall, species will need to move about two-fifths a kilometer per year to keep up with changing conditions, 10 to 100 times faster than they’ve ever had to move before to cope with changing climates. Mountain dwellers won’t have to move as far as critters in flatter landscapes to find a new home — just 10 or so kilometers over the next century, compared with more than a hundred.

One recent study suggests ocean-dwelling animals may need to move as fast or faster than land species — and to advance the timing of breeding, spawning, migration and other seasonal life events even more. The work, from the marine biological impacts working group at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis at the University of California, Santa Barbara, was published last year in Science.

The conclusions of Loarie and coauthors echo the 2003 findings of Parmesan and Yohe. But instead of documenting changes that have already occurred, Loarie’s group developed an index that can be used to predict future range shifts. Applying their predictions to nature preserves worldwide, the researchers arrived at the dire conclusion that traveling temperatures will force wildlife out of all but 8 percent of those reserves within a century.

Looking at the problem from a slightly different angle — how far animals actually are able to travel to establish new homes and how inclined they are to do so — researchers at the University of Washington in Seattle also came up with grim figures. This year in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (SN Online: 5/14/12), Carrie Schloss and colleagues found that about 9 percent of mammal species in the Western Hemisphere won’t be able to move fast enough to keep pace with climate change. In some areas, more than half the mammal species will be unable to keep up.

The Loarie and Schloss studies don’t just spin out gloomy scenarios, though. They also point to conservation strategies, such as designing reserves that include a range of landscapes — and associated climate regimes — and creating linked networks of protected areas.

Given the complex, interconnected pressures on animals these days, the varied ways species are responding and the projections that temperature may rise another 1.8 to 4 degrees by the end of the 21st century, it’s time to completely rethink conservation aims and approaches, says paleoecologist Anthony Barnosky. People have been accustomed to setting aside reserves and expecting them to simultaneously protect the natural landscape, the species that live there and the associated “ecosystem services” — ecological interactions that provide humans with food, clean water, recreational opportunities and the like. But now, with plants and animals moving around, old associations breaking up and new ones forming, it may no longer be possible to protect all three facets of nature at once.

“You have to decide, am I interested in a species? Am I interested in a landscape? Or am I interested in a feeling of wilderness?” says Barnosky, of the University of California, Berkeley. Saving species may mean actively intervening and helping animals move to areas they can’t reach on their own. Protecting ecosystem services may — or may not — depend on keeping specific groups of species together. That’s still an open question. And preserving wilderness, nature free from human meddling, will require “realizing that the species that live there today are probably going to be very different from the species that live there tomorrow.”

Nancy Ross-Flanigan is a freelance writer based in Newaygo, Mich.


Climate responders
Over the last dozen years or so, scientists have linked a plethora of changes in the animal community to a warming climate.

Marbled salamander (Ambystoma opacum) 
Fall breeding times have shifted for members of this species living in a wetland in South Carolina, with the start of breeding delayed by more than two weeks from 1981 to 2007.

Southern flying squirrel(Glaucomys volans) 
Flying squirrels in Michigan’s Lower Peninsula have expanded their range northward in recent decades, while those in the Upper Peninsula have gone eastward. The squirrels are now found 225 kilometers northeast of their pre-1960s range limit.

Small pearl-bordered fritillary(Clossiana selene)
Though the northern limit of the European range of this butterfly remained stable during recent decades, the southern extent of the range contracted over the same period — shrinking the total range.

Black surfperch (Embiotoca jacksoni)
A decline in abundance in this species in the Southern California Bight between the early 1980s and 1995 was linked to the drop in habitat productivity brought by warming waters.

American goldfinch (Spinus tristis)
The midpoint of the range of this species’ wintering grounds has moved more than 300 kilometers northward in the last four decades.

Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae)
Penguins living at four sites along the western Antarctic Peninsula advance the start of their nesting by almost two days per degree Celsius change in October temperatures.

From top: © Lynda Richardson/Corbis; Nicholas Jr/Getty I

Entertainment

Blake Lively Shines as Surfer Stranded in Shark-Infested Waters

  The Shallows Blu-ray Review by Kam Williams Blake Lively Shines as Surfer Stranded in Shark-Infested Waters Nancy Adams (Blake Lively) was so shaken by her mother's (Janelle Bailey) untimely death that she's dropped out of med school. In order to feel closer to her dearly departed mom, she's decided to vacation at the same exotic Mexican retreat where she was reportedly conceived back in 1991. An avid surfer, she also plans to search … [Read More its Good for You.....]

Books

Keep Walking in Prayer… Until You Can\’t Come Back

  Keep Walking in Prayer... Until You Can't Come Back by Reverend Dorothy Scott Boulware Xulon Press Paperback, $10.99 104 pages ISBN: 978-1-4984-7454-2 Book Review by Kam Williams “By way of introduction, I'm a Baptist Methodist Pentecostal Evangelical non-denominational retired pastor, retired newspaper editor, former minister of music, former fingerprint technician, wife of 47 years, mother of four, grandmother of five, … [Read More its Good for You...]

Art

More Than a Score

  ACRONYM TO FOLLOW by Peter Brav   Finally Our Day has come There’s a Day for everything For doughnuts, siblings, eight track tapes Grilled cheese, daughters and sons to work Encouragement, Alzheimer’s Coffee, math, chewing gum Blasphemy, yo-yos And now finally One for us Truly a Day to celebrate National Don’t Shoot An Unarmed Brother Doctor King Not Seeing Progress George Orwell Laughing It Is So About the … [Read More its Good For You...]

Real Estate

New Home Sales Jump in April

  New Home Sales Jump in April By Burt Carey Sales of new homes hit their highest rate since 2008 in April, according to the Commerce Department’s U.S. Census Bureau. April sales increased 16.6 percent over March figures, which correlates to a seasonally adjusted rate of 619,000 home sales projected for the year. The median price of those new homes was $321,000, the highest median price ever recorded. That’s up 9.7 percent … [Read More its Good for You.....]

Lifestyle

Jahking and I!

  Jahking Guillory The “Kicks” Interview with Kam Williams Jahking and I! An undeniable young talent on the rise, actor and rapper Jahking Guillory is already a veteran in the entertainment business at the age of 14. Born and raised in Long Beach California, ‘King’ started pursuing his dream at 9 years-old, landing jobs in national commercials, music videos and national print campaigns. Graduating to larger roles in film and TV, 'King … [Read More its Good for You...]

Outdoors

230 LXF from Tidewater Packs A Punch in a Small Package

  230 LXF from Tidewater Packs A Punch in a Small Package By Ted Lund Are you looking for a family-friendly center console that’s got the luxury of a larger boat in a smaller package? Then look no further than the 230 LXF from Tidewater. The 23-foot, center console has the same features as the rest its large LXF brothers, including comfortable full upholstery, stainless steel cup holders. And a newly-designed console with glove box and … [Read More its Good for You...]

Sports

The Season Begins

  The Season Begins by Amy Lignor   Yes, it’s finally time to get down to some real business when it comes to the world of sports. (No offense to Serena at the U.S. Open, but her constant winning is not exactly new.) All this rain across the country has assured that lawns will be overgrown come Monday morning, unless citizens decide to use Saturday to mow. Why is that? Because football is back and Sundays are no longer “nothing to … [Read More its Good for You...]

Business

Scholastic Announces Sales of More Than 3.3 Million Copies of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child

  Scholastic Announces Sales of More Than 3.3 Million Copies of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child Parts One and Two New York, NY (August 10, 2016) — Harry Potter and the Cursed Child Parts One and Two script book, the eighth Harry Potter story by J.K. Rowling, John Tiffany, and Jack Thorne, published in the U.S. and Canada by Scholastic has sold more than 3.3 million copies in North America to date.Scholastic announced a first printing … [Read More its Good for You...]

Travel

Vacation Time Has Turned “Spooky”

  Vacation Time Has Turned “Spooky” by Amy Lignor   Myths and legends, both spooky and surreal, are becoming the subject of many books and newspaper articles lately. And the location of many, oddly enough, happen to be in the Southwest. It used to be that a nice white sandy beach was the one place we yearned to go on vacation to get away from it all. Now, however, people are searching for places to travel where legends still exist, and … [Read More its Good for You...]

Green Living

Doing Our Part

  Doing Our Part by Amy Lignor   There are books being published as of late – wonderful books telling the stories of amazing wildlife rescues, as well as neighborhoods and communities across the U.S. that have taken on projects to save the wildlife in their own surrounding areas.   We always talk about these “success stories,” yet never actually give information on exactly how these “problems” turned into “victories.” … [Read More its Good for You...]